Update drilled to iOS 7? Ready the class-action lawsuit against Apple. Here are all the details. New developments have led an Apple user...
Update drilled to iOS 7? Ready the class-action lawsuit against Apple. Here are all the details.
New developments have led an Apple user to deposit a new class-action lawsuit against the Cupertino company. The action was due to alleged irregularities Apple. Specifically, the Cupertino company would act by creating a malicious damage to FaceTime on iOS 6 as well as to encourage users to perform the update to iOS 7.
According to revealed by AppleInsider that Apple's action was dictated by the desire to save on external server rental.
Of course, to start a class-action and give credibility to the action you need to provide clear evidence of what you are supporting. These tests are provided by internal documents to Apple and private e-mails that were announced at the time of the trial against VirnetX. The involvement of Akamai seems quite likely given that in 2010 for FaceTime Apple used a technology that exploited the Akamai server. In 2012 to FaceTime Apple he was forced to only use the Akamai servers for problems with the patent of the other technology.
Just at that time Apple would voluntarily made a bug to prevent the operation of FaceTime on iOS 6. In doing so Apple pushed users to upgrade to iOS 7 (suggested solution directly to users), no longer having to pay for the Akamai server.
Apple's strategy seems to have achieved the desired results because from that date the iOS 7 adoption has been much quicker. This would have resulted in harm to users, contributing among other things to make iPhone 4 and iPhone 4S more unstable.
The class-action lawsuit was filed in California by Christina Grace. At the moment the details of the actual damages sought from Apple were not disclosed.
New developments have led an Apple user to deposit a new class-action lawsuit against the Cupertino company. The action was due to alleged irregularities Apple. Specifically, the Cupertino company would act by creating a malicious damage to FaceTime on iOS 6 as well as to encourage users to perform the update to iOS 7.
According to revealed by AppleInsider that Apple's action was dictated by the desire to save on external server rental.
Of course, to start a class-action and give credibility to the action you need to provide clear evidence of what you are supporting. These tests are provided by internal documents to Apple and private e-mails that were announced at the time of the trial against VirnetX. The involvement of Akamai seems quite likely given that in 2010 for FaceTime Apple used a technology that exploited the Akamai server. In 2012 to FaceTime Apple he was forced to only use the Akamai servers for problems with the patent of the other technology.
Just at that time Apple would voluntarily made a bug to prevent the operation of FaceTime on iOS 6. In doing so Apple pushed users to upgrade to iOS 7 (suggested solution directly to users), no longer having to pay for the Akamai server.
Apple's strategy seems to have achieved the desired results because from that date the iOS 7 adoption has been much quicker. This would have resulted in harm to users, contributing among other things to make iPhone 4 and iPhone 4S more unstable.
The class-action lawsuit was filed in California by Christina Grace. At the moment the details of the actual damages sought from Apple were not disclosed.
